Mookie:

I like the handle. It sounds friendly. And I understand that you
are. I don't know how much you know about the series of documents
you've agreed to keep copies of, but I appreciate the help.

The report enclosed below was one I wrote after it had finally
dawned on me that there were quite a few of these things called SPDs
around. By the time I wrote this report, I had learned that at
*least* 200 of them had been written and issued. I guess, though,
that I was still too stupid to realize fully that the very people I
was sending my reports to were the very people who had created SPDs
to begin with. Stupidity is hard to overcome, because one is too
stupid to realize that he is stupid, therefore stupidly does nothing
about his stupidity, and stupidly goes on being stupid. Which is
just stupid.

I caught on later, but perhaps too late.

Here is the report.

                                    Randy McDonald

-------------------------------------------------------------------

TO:     LRH Communicator International                  15 May 1995
FROM:   JON RANDALL MCDONALD

cc:     David Miscavige, COB RTC            ED International
        Jim Morrow, TCO OSA Int.            C/O OSA Int.
        AVC                                 Senior C/S International
        International Justice Chief         LRH Communicators
        President, C. of S. Int             Ethics Officers
        Board of Directors, C. of S. Int    Board of Directors, RTC


                    HIGH CRIME, SUPPRESSIVE ACT REPORT

1.  Issuing alter-ised Scientology technical data or information or
    instructional or admin procedures, calling it Scientology or
    calling it something else to confuse or deceive people as to the
    true source, beliefs and practices of Scientology.

2.  Falsely attributing or falsely representing oneself or others as
    source of Scientology or Dianetics technology; or using any
    position gained with staff and/or public to falsely attribute
    nonsource material to source or to falsely represent non-source
    material as authorized Scientology or Dianetics technology.

 3. Violation or neglect of any of the ten points of Keeping
    Scientology Working.

 4. Issuing an order that certain HCO PLs or HCOB are not to be
    followed.

                                JIM MORROW
    Tax Compliance Officer, Office of Special Affairs International

                                RAY MITHOFF
                        Senior C/S International

                        PERSON OR PERSONS UNKNOWN
    Authority, Verifications and Corrections Unit International


    "If it is not in an HCO Policy Letter, it is not policy."
                                    L. RON HUBBARD
                                    HCO PL 5 March 1965, Issue 11,
                                   "POLICY, SOURCE OF"

Jim Morrow and Ray Mithoff have both written and had issued as
"policy" a type of illegal, off-policy directive known variously as
a "Scientology Policy Directive," or an "SPD." (See attachments A
and B.)

No such issue has ever been established by any HCO PL. No HCO PL
authored by L. Ron Hubbard as contained in the OEC volumes refers to
any such issue. In short, it is an illegal and unauthorized type of
issue that has been used by the two terminals named above (and
possibly others) to set themselves up as SOURCE of Church policy.

This HIGH CRIME has been aided and abetted by unknown persons
operating under the mantle of the Authority, Verifications and
Corrections Unit International, as these issues were both approved
there.

The fiction of the "SPD" was propagated in the release of the
current edition of OEC volumes. In the back of OEC Volume 0,
beginning on page 721 is a "List of Types of Issues and Magazines."
This list is unattributed as to authorship. On page 729, as part of
this list, is the following entry:

    "Scientology Policy Directive (SPD),
    its purpose is to provide an issue type for policy for the
    Church of Scientology, and to distinguish from policy issued by
    LRH which is issued in HCO PL form. Senior to all administrative
    issues except HCO PLs and any other issues or advices by LRH.
    Its distribution is all staff unless otherwise designated. Black
    ink on blue paper."

This definition is in direct and flagrant contravention to HCO PL 5
March 1965, Issue II, "POLICY, SOURCE OF" which states clearly and
unambiguously: "If it is not in an HCO Policy Letter, it is not
policy."

In addition, these two referenced SP Directives set up orders to
staff and public. In order to comply with these illegal orders would
require the negation of and noncompliance with certain LRH HCO PLs,
including but not necessarily limited to:

    1. HCO PL 9 August 1972, "SENIORITY OF ORDERS"
    2. HCO PL 24 September 1970RA, "ISSUES, TYPES OF"
    3. HCO PL 14 June 1965, Issue II, "POLITICS, FREEDOM FROM"

This point is actually the subject of separate reports, but needed
to be mentioned in this report as well.


Randall McDonald